Probabilistic Seismic Performance of Rocking-Foundation and Hinging-Column Bridges

Many engineers are hesitant to specify rocking foundations for ordinary bridges because of the unsubstantiated notion that rocking bridges are more susceptible to instability than conventional fixed-base bridges. A parametric study using a finite element model including large deformation effects compares the performance and stability of stiff, flexible, tall, and short hinging-column and rocking-foundation systems. Eighty different ground motions, scaled using incremental dynamic analysis, were considered. Results show that, in a probabilistic sense, bridges with rocking foundations are more stable than bridges with hinging columns if their fundamental periods are the same and if base shear coefficients to initiate hinging or rocking mechanisms are the same. Maximum drifts are not much affected by changing between rocking and hinging mechanisms except near collapse, but residual drifts are smaller for rocking systems. The results also challenge the notion that rocking systems require a different design approach than hinging column systems. [DOI: 10.1193/1.4000093]